columns, building, massachusetts @ Pixabay

For the past few years, my life has been spent in and around the tech industry, working on a variety of projects. One such project has been studying how companies are using technology to build a better world. The data I’ve collected over the past few years has led to a number of ideas for how to change the world for the better. Some of these ideas have been implemented in a few places in the world, and others have been further developed.

It’s no surprise that when a topic is so broad, there are multiple schools of thought. These different ideas and schools of thought have all been discussed in my lectures at Stanford University, so they are clearly a part of my education. However, in order to really understand why and how a technology company may be doing something, you really need to understand what they are trying to accomplish.

The main idea behind STEAM is to develop something that is educational. In order to accomplish this, a company needs to be able to say, “yes, we know what we’re doing, but we’re trying to educate you in the process.” But how do they educate? By making sure that their educational efforts are transparent and clear to the people who are actually using the technology. This was the goal of Stevens Institute of Technology.

It is by no means a perfect system, but it does help provide some transparency. And in the case of STEAM, it’s by no means perfect. But at least it’s an effort to help the creators of education products be more open and transparent.

When I first heard about this, I thought I would never be able to write a paragraph about it here. But I have a few suggestions for a couple of the things that I think are good about STEAM. So, for example, the pre-calc courses are good for anyone who wishes to go through the entire process of learning to take calculus or algebra. They also have something to offer for those who wish to take classes in computer science, physics, and engineering.

A lot of the stuff that could be done with STEAM could be done with more traditional methods, but at least the pre-calc courses are a step in the right direction.

As much as I’m glad that STEAM is a great idea, I just don’t think it’s worth it all at once. If we want to learn to code, it would be best if we could do it all in one go. So I think we should do that first.

That’s my point. I think STEAM is great, but the idea of making it a one-time event that all the students can take is a bit misleading. If we want STEAM to be a real world, world-changing experience for us all, we need to focus our efforts on something more enduring. Something that will serve as a lasting tribute to STEAM as a whole and not just one class.

To get a bit of a perspective on the idea of “stevens institute of technology” vs. “Steven’s” in the first place, I’m going to point out the fact that a number of people who claim to have been in it have stated that the program was run by “Steven’s” (Steve Jobs). That kind of thing is a little misleading. Steve was the head of AIG, not the program.

In the video above, Steve Jobs is implied to have been involved with the program, but the video itself shows that he didn’t even start it until after he left Apple.

His prior experience as a freelancer has given him the skills to handle any project that is thrown at him. He's also an avid reader of self-help books and journals, but his favorite thing? Working with Business Today!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here